Re: "bad deriv in da" error

• Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: Re no blocking wait on Linux"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

----- Begin Included Message -----

>From ups-users-approval_at_ukc.ac.uk Wed Jul  8 23:38:48 1998
Return-Path: <ups-users-approval_at_ukc.ac.uk>
From: bob_at_fla.fujitsu.com (Bob Carragher)
Originator: bob_at_fla.fujitsu.com (Bob Carragher)
To: ups-users_at_ukc.ac.uk
Reply-To: bob_at_fla.fujitsu.com (Bob Carragher)
Subject: Re: "bad deriv in da" error 
In-Reply-To: Message <199807081515.IAA20754_at_habu.metaflow.com> 
             from rschnapp_at_metaflow.com (Russ Schnapp) 
             on Wed, 08 Jul 1998 08:15:31 -0700.
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 1998 13:13:34 -0700
Sender: bob_at_fla.fujitsu.com

rschnapp_at_metaflow.com (Russ Schnapp) sez:

> I don't know whether the aborts I've seen had this error message.  I
> have certainly encountered aborts upon attempting to inspect a variable
> in a large program.
> 
> I haven't seen this problem since upgrading to 3.32, thank goodness
> (and, presumably, Rod Armstrong).

Well, I've emailed this information back to Rod Armstrong, but
in case others are interested:  the version I'm using is the
latest available, 3.32.  I've had this problem with every
version of UPS 3.x.  Seems like it might be a fundamental
bug/feature.  B-(

				Bob


----- End Included Message -----

• Next message: Ian Edwards: ""bad deriv in da" error"
• Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: Re no blocking wait on Linux"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 13 2002 - 21:55:18 GMT