From: Bob Carragher (bob_at_fla.fujitsu.com)
Date: Fri Mar 17 2000 - 01:18:15 GMT
russ_at_amc.com (Russell Browne) writes: > > ........... This should not pose a problem. So I don't > > think I can fully buy the argument that UPS is running > > out of allocateable system memory, unless one of my > > assumptions is wrong, and seriously wrong at that. Any > > ideas on what the problem might be? > > The problem is that the stack pointer points to non-existant > memory. Thus it is impossible to access the memory at the stack > pointer to see what the previous frame is. Hm, so would it be a non-trivial task to somehow modify UPS so that it recognizes this situation, and tries to see if it can find the previous, valid call frame? Maybe it could somehow highlight the current call frame as illegal (since it partially or fully occupies an illegal portion of memory)? Bob
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 13 2002 - 21:51:33 GMT