Re: UPS and GPL

From: Dibyendu Majumdar (dibyendu_at_mazumdar.demon.co.uk)
Date: Thu Dec 07 2000 - 00:32:38 GMT

Next message: Dibyendu Majumdar: "Re: UPS and GPL"
Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: UPS and GPL"
In reply to: Callum Gibson: "Re: UPS and GPL"
Next in thread: Callum Gibson: "Re: UPS and GPL"
Reply: Callum Gibson: "Re: UPS and GPL"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Dibyendu> Any chance of UPS being licensed via GPL ?
Callum> Why would you want to do that?

Many reasons. I would like to use the C Interpreter in UPS in my own
projects (which are licensed via GPL) but I do not because of the current
license.

How do you define a commercial product ? What does it mean to 'copy bits of
ups for your own use' ? I think the current license is ambiguous and can be
interpreted in different ways.

Dibyendu

Next message: Dibyendu Majumdar: "Re: UPS and GPL"
Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: UPS and GPL"
In reply to: Callum Gibson: "Re: UPS and GPL"
Next in thread: Callum Gibson: "Re: UPS and GPL"
Reply: Callum Gibson: "Re: UPS and GPL"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 13 2002 - 21:51:33 GMT