From: Russell Browne (russ_at_amc.com)
Date: Thu Jan 04 2001 - 02:22:35 GMT
> > > ... is it worth while to change med3 to quiet the warnings? > > Well, if it was just a matter of one or two warnings, I'd be inclined to say > no. But this generates *338* warnings, and the initializer lists are in ad- > dition deceptive to the eye because of the NULL initialization of a long > (well, it confused *me*, at any rate :-). > > For both of those reasons, my vote (assuming I get one) is "yes". > > Terry R. Friedrichsen > Fixing that aspect of med3 proved to be pretty easy, and prompted me to fix some other long standing gripes. Med3 (my version) now outputs readable data! Russ
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 13 2002 - 21:51:33 GMT