RE: anybody tried to make test in ups-3.37-beta2/lib/libx11wn ?

From: Ian Edwards (ian_at_concerto.demon.co.uk)
Date: Thu Oct 11 2001 - 15:16:30 BST

• Next message: John Utz: "anybody tried to make test in ups-3.37-beta2/lib/libx11wn ?"
• Previous message: Charles Read: "Re: ups for Linux 7.1?"
• In reply to: John Utz: "anybody tried to make test in ups-3.37-beta2/lib/libx11wn ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On 10-Oct-01 John Utz wrote:
> it's not good. :-)
> 
> may repeated instances of
> 
> ./testwn.c:1411: `WHITE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> ./testwn.c:1415: `WN_BG' undeclared (first use in this function)
> ./testwn.c:1512: `WN_FG' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 
> what the heck are these?

Hello John,

probably my fault - was not updated when multi-screen support added.
The attached version runs, but I am not sure it is working as it should.

Regards,
Ian.



 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
  E-mail: Ian Edwards <ian_at_concerto.demon.co.uk>
  Date:   11-Oct-01             Time:   15:16:30

  Early Music Record Labels    - http://www.recordlabels.org/
  'ups' debugger for C/C++/f77 - http://www.concerto.demon.co.uk/UPS/
 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

• text/plain attachment: testwn.c

• Next message: John Utz: "anybody tried to make test in ups-3.37-beta2/lib/libx11wn ?"
• Previous message: Charles Read: "Re: ups for Linux 7.1?"
• In reply to: John Utz: "anybody tried to make test in ups-3.37-beta2/lib/libx11wn ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 13 2002 - 21:51:34 GMT