Re: Bit field issues in Solaris 2.8

• Previous message: Matt Seitz: "Re: ups Next and Step acting like Cont"
• Maybe in reply to: Steve Harris: "Bit field issues in Solaris 2.8"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Thanks Tom!

I implemented your fix and the bitfields look and work great!

 Steve

>
>It was an endianess problem, and 3.37 does work as far as I can, at
>least for bitfields based on 32 bit types. I don't believe it worked
>for bitfields based on 16 bit types however, which is what my original
>fix was all about (that and 64 bit bitfield support).
>
>Unfortunately my previous was wrong on big endian platforms. A fix has
>just been committed to CVS and a patch against CVS is attached.
>
>Tom
>
>-- 
>Tom Hughes (thh_at_cyberscience.com)
>Software Engineer, Cyberscience Corporation
>http://www.cyberscience.com/
>

• Next message: Ian Edwards: "UPS 3.38-beta2 available"
• Next message: jack: "We provide you the best quality lead acid batteries"
• Previous message: Matt Seitz: "Re: ups Next and Step acting like Cont"
• Maybe in reply to: Steve Harris: "Bit field issues in Solaris 2.8"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 18 2003 - 10:09:10 BST