Re: Bit field issues in Solaris 2.8

From: Steve Harris (
Date: Thu Aug 07 2003 - 17:52:34 BST

  • Next message: Tom Hughes: "Re: Bit field issues in Solaris 2.8"
    Hi Tom!
    >Have you tried this in 3.38beta1 or a CVS build? Only I did rework
    >the bitfield editing stuff to fix a number of bugs and that was probably
    >too recent to be in 3.37 I think.
    I am now running the 3.38beta and it behaves the same way. I have 
    found it to be a bitfield structure display issue. The bit values are
    actually correct in the program. they just don't show up right through
    >One hing that may be catching you is that older versions of ups
    >may misreport the value of bitfields I think - that was all part
    >of my fixes.
    We started using UPS in 1993 and had no problems with the bitfield
    displays until now.
    Hey! I just downloaded and compiled UPS 3.33 and the bitfields are
    displaying and editing very well. This will be much preferred over

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Aug 08 2003 - 11:40:26 BST